| title: | Re RFC gro Is it ok to share a single nap |
|
On 2010-08-29 20:39, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le dimanche 29 aoĂťt 2010 Ă 10:06 -0700, David Miller a ĂŠcrit :
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:59:51 +0200
Actually, when GRO compares napi- dev to skb- dev?
Hmmm, I thought the code made a skb- dev comparison with the
existing SKBs in the list when checking for same-flow matches.
It doesnt, probably based upon the assumption that a NAPI
instance maps to a unique device, the very topic were
discussing right now :-/
It does the check, Stephen added it in the commit I mentioned to start
this thread.
With net-next-2.6 this now reads :
Since Stephen didnt seem to miss this too much it seems quite obvious
to me this check should be removed.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at rel="nofollow" vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
